ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain Case | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 86 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by Anonymous on Thursday August 29 2002, @09:28PM (#8768)
    Not to detract from your UDRP and trademark focus - you use the phrase "official naming system of the Internet". There is no such "official" naming system. There is the dominant root system but it has not been annointed as "official" by anyone who has the authority and power to endow such a label.

    In the root system that I use, many of the new.net names are real and true top level domains; they are not virtualizations created by the appending of search suffixes to non FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Names.)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by Anonymous on Thursday August 29 2002, @11:57PM (#8769)
    I knew that this decision would bring out the four New.net users who are still around. The decision does not change the fact the for the vast majority of Internet users worldwide, New.net is a non-issue. It is amazing they are still in business. If they were so good, why didn't they bid for .org? It would have been a waste of the money they don't have, because ICANN would NEVER let them join the party.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday August 30 2002, @02:25AM (#8773)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    I see most of the commentary so far is pro-and-con about new.net. I'll note that my intent in posting this article was not to support new.net, or to bash them either (though it is my opinion that their domains aren't really part of the Internet's naming system except as fourth-level domains beneath new.net -- by itself, a new.net name is no more an Internet address than is an AOL keyword), but to mention important aspects of the decision that are likely to become relevant precedents in all sorts of domain disputes in the future, including ones regarding ICANN-approved TLDs.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: good ruling
    by Anonymous on Friday August 30 2002, @03:54AM (#8778)
    Glad to see the complainant gets labeled as a reverse domain hijacker. It's rare to see this happens, but it's good. Good Peter:)

    By the way, the USPTO assertion that TLDs have no source-identifying significance is not reasonable. I once submitted trademark application for productregister.com. My point is that they approved EC-productregister as trademark before. Why can't they approve my application for productregister.com. Since productregister is kind of generic, therefore, EC- must be the part that can serve in a large part the source identifier. Likewise, productregister.com should be approved for the same reason because .com here is unique. Yes, .com is not unique, but the combination produtregister.com is. There is only one productregister.com in the whole world (at least now). Use of .com here make the mark unique. Then the examing attorney does not take my arguement. Anyone should be able to get confused with EC-productregister and productregister.com. Obviously they are different. A first grader should be able to tell them apart.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday August 30 2002, @04:32AM (#8784)
    User #2810 Info
    Even Amazon has a history. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com