Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Registrar Market Share: An Alternative Perspective | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Misunderstanding the brunt of the article
    by BenEdelman on Friday November 28 2003, @05:05PM (#12701)
    User #3219 Info | http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/edelman
    I fear you're still misreading large portions of the article.

    For example, "2) It just seems to me that using a sample of the 1000 fortune 1000 companies is skewed if the purpose is to determine what registrars are attractive to those planning to put a domain to web use as opposed to warehousers, etc." Fair enough! But the article doesn't proceed in this way. Notice that I compare usage by Fortune 1000 companies with usage by "regular folks" (well known enough to be listed in Yahoo) with registrants taken as a whole. Nowhere do I assume that the actions of Fortune 1000 companies are representative -- indeed, quite the contrary, I point out how Fortune registrants are different.

    Similarly, as to my inferences being skewed by domains used only for non-web purposes: The question isn't whether there are such registrations at lots of registrars; clearly there are. The question is whether such registations are likely to be more prevalent at certain kinds of registrars than others. I still think there's no problem here -- that there's no reason to think the kind of registrants who want to make non-web use of their domains will systematically and in significant numbers choose particular registrants distinct from practices of the rest of domain registrants.

    I completely agree re the significance of registrar user interfaces, customer service, etc. Notice the many questions on precisely these subjects in my survey of registrars.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Misunderstanding the brunt of the article by BenEdelman
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  
    Re:Misunderstanding the brunt of the article
    by ldg on Friday November 28 2003, @08:57PM (#12703)
    User #2935 Info | http://example.com/
    "completely agree re the significance of registrar user interfaces, customer service, etc. Notice the many questions on precisely these subjects in my survey of registrars."

    I don't want to belabor the issue, Ben. I was attempting to make a point that there is, indeed, a difference between the F-1000 companies, average registrants and those who register domains for non-web use. Average registrants come in many varieties, of course. Those registering for non-web use are, IMO, more likely to understand a bit more about the registration mechanics and DNS in general. Therefore, they may be a bit more discriminating regarding the registrar they choose. The other side is the average registrant who may have little knowledge re DNS or much of anything else except it's time to do something about a domain name. Those are the ones who may be sucked into the NSI rat race simply because that name is "in your face" more. Many of them don't transfer right away because they are unaware of the game (business)...

    Anyway, choice of registrars for different types of registrants is not someting one can easily pin down, IMHO. I hear from many registrants quite often - usually when there are problems - who are seeking another registrar or a solution to the situation. I don't recommend registrars, but suggest places to do some due diligence.

    Apparantly the research you are doing is quite targeted, so my comments probably don't apply. It also means that the data has little meaning for me, at least, since the comparisons don't impact anyone with whom I am in contact. We don't even have the same definition for cybersquatters. :)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com