| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
4 days of SiteFinder keeps VeriSign in Web's top 50
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 20 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Just to hint what a Shadow ICANN would look like (and perhaps give the ICANN board members something to think about), it might be fun to have the ITU volunteer some representatives for the "governmental" positions. ;)
A little competition from a competing "board" might force the real one to act the right way, esp. as one would have a running scorecard on how both fared over time on the big issues. If the real ICANN board underperforms, it would create a strong case for its replacement.
ICANN 4.0 = Shadow ICANN ;)
Oh, and if the ICANN Board wanted to start on the right path, first things they could do today are: 1) drop WLS (as it violates the consensus principles that ICANN's board members spoke about so many times on Capitol Hill), and 2) compel VeriSign to return the audited gross revenues that SiteFinder generated while they had wildcards enabled.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
