Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    RegistryPRO to offer 2nd-Level Domains | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    What He Said...
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Monday October 27 2003, @01:42PM (#12545)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Interesting, Michael. You just said almost exactly what I said (http://onthenet.ambler.net [ambler.net])

    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    It could possibly be dangerous for ICANN ...
    by KarlAuerbach on Monday October 27 2003, @02:17PM (#12546)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    It could possibly dangerous for ICANN to acceed to .pro's request without proper process. Verisign is lurking in the wings and if .pro is given a quick "OK" Verisign could easily claim that it should have its "sitefinder" actions processed by ICANN in the same, expiditious way.

    Apart from the merits of this requested change (and I agree that it hints of unfairness to allow post-award changes when so many other applicants were denied), it is probably important for ICANN to create procedures, such as an opinion from the security committee, regarding the effects of the proposed change upon the technical operation of the net - sort of a "technology impact report".

    Departing from the topic at hand - I can't help but wonder at the .pro folks - they were given their TLD *before* my term on the ICANN board began, and they never got off the ground during my entire 2 1/2 year term, and now, several months later, they are still wiggling around. One has to wonder about the "professionals" behind .pro. I have a sneeking suspiciion that if they allowed the members of the oldest profession to buy names under .pro that their business prospects would quickly improve.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    ICANN and Reality
    by jberryhill on Monday October 27 2003, @04:02PM (#12549)
    User #3013 Info

    From the ICANN notice:

    "On the agenda for the 31 October 2003 Board meeting is the proposal by RegistryPro, Inc. (the ICANN-designated operator of the .PRO registry) to begin offering domain registration services at the second level in addition to the current offering of .pro registrations at the profession-specific third-level (these are currently law.pro, med.pro, and cpa.pro)."

    Operator of the .PRO registry? They operate a registry? In this dimension?

    Current offering of .pro registrations? Offered to whom? Imaginary friends of theirs?

    I hope that the $300,000 new TLD evaluation report manages to applaud the .pro registry on the outstanding contribution they have made in the "stability of the internet" area. They get a perfect score there. Not a single party who ponied up tall cash for "defensive" registrations has been disappointed, there has been zero incidence of cybersquatting, and not a single registrant complaint.

    This new offering will be a substantial savings to those lawyers who also perform tooth extractions.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Don't Let Them All In
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Monday October 27 2003, @05:47PM (#12551)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    How, pray tell Anonymous user, is letting anyone who wishes to offer services not in the interest of the typical netizen? Do tell.

    You can't claim that it's confusing, as we have hundreds of TLDs now. If adding 30 or so more is confusing, we're there already.

    You can't claim that it would be a load on the root servers, or a technical instability, as we've not only seen none of that to date, but the inventors of the DNS have said as much: it won't be an issue.

    It certainly can't be because multiple offerings, creating competition will bring prices down further and give more consumer choice. Because the is in the best interest of the typical netizen.

    So... dear Anonymous user... I'm all ears.

    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com