| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Self-Regulation Self Destructs?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 20 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
Chris, no one defended IOD more than I when it was being a labeled a "pirate" well before the 2000 application round. Then you backed it up by filing through the formal process that was alotted to you. And you should be admired for stepping up as you did against long odds. My opinion has been that you can't take a monopoly, insert an artificial retail layer, and then say that the monopoly has been slain by way of competition. The market value of the .com zone continues to rise far exceeding the sum of all other zones in existence. The white paper inferred such a dominant position concentrated in in one zone could result in market place "abuse". But, what irks me is when people with vested interests then hide behind the "what is best for the consumer" argument while the monopoly remains in plain view, and that is what got me going on this thread (sorry). So, I ask again: how can a monopolist have competitors? (don't answer :)
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
