| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Self-Regulation Self Destructs?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 20 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
Chris, Verisign is going to capture the market valuation of .com that is way beyond $6 per unit. You can talk about "consensus policy" and "abuse of a monopoly" until blue in the face. I will leave things like legal contract infringement and adverse effects to Internet functionality to the experts. But, at this point, I see little going on to bet against their ability to implement business models to capture the market valuation of .com that has been so well protected. Retail business models that have assumed otherwise are in harms way by their own choosing and will need to adjust. Influencing the ablity to sell "new registry services" such as .Web might be a good place to start, like 3 years ago. That's the reality, in my view. I do see a cause-effect relationship here and thus not straying...but we can agree to disagree if that's ok.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
