ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Self-Regulation Self Destructs? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 20 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Self-Regulation
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Tuesday October 14 2003, @08:39PM (#12467)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Well... all I can say is that most of the "gotchas" that we pointed out in the 2000 application process have come to pass, and our application, in hindsight, was more accurate than any selected registry.

    A company that has been involved in the DNS since the inception of the new TLD issue, who has consistently been fair and ethical, and who didn't try to play politics, but, instead, looked towards objective financial and technical criteria. Go figure.

    I look forward to the next round. Whenever it may happen. Maybe we'll have a better go of it now that nobody can claim that our application is out of touch with reality.

    --
    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Self-Regulation by cambler
    Re:Self-Regulation
    by RFassett on Wednesday October 15 2003, @04:30AM (#12468)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    Chris, no one defended IOD more than I when it was being a labeled a "pirate" well before the 2000 application round. Then you backed it up by filing through the formal process that was alotted to you. And you should be admired for stepping up as you did against long odds. My opinion has been that you can't take a monopoly, insert an artificial retail layer, and then say that the monopoly has been slain by way of competition. The market value of the .com zone continues to rise far exceeding the sum of all other zones in existence. The white paper inferred such a dominant position concentrated in in one zone could result in market place "abuse". But, what irks me is when people with vested interests then hide behind the "what is best for the consumer" argument while the monopoly remains in plain view, and that is what got me going on this thread (sorry). So, I ask again: how can a monopolist have competitors? (don't answer :)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com