| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
GNSO Asked to Develop Procedure to Rule on New Registry Services
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
These are all good objections against my specific example.
So, who should make judgments about new registry services?
Verisign, in particular, is in a situation in which it can use registry services to leverage its government-granted monopoly into other markets; in the sitefinder case, it's also creating collateral damage on the technical and stability fronts.
I guess it's clear that decisions on introducing new registry services should better not be left to dominant registries, in particular in the current market situation.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:The GNSO is asked to *design* the process.....
by tlr
|
|
|
|
|
Well, a distinction between "dominant" and "non-dominant" providers is a staple of regulatory method, so that's a place to begin. Many regulations have been imposed on ALL registries simply because it seemed to make sense to apply it to Verisign.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
