ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    VeriSign Caves, For Now | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 29 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Wow!
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Friday October 03 2003, @11:42AM (#12375)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Paint me very surprised. I honestly thought they'd play hardball.

    Their release, however, smacks of hypocracy. They're gung-ho about innovation, yet they've stonewalled and helped delay new TLDs, and are foreclosing on the dropping domain market (and its serious innovative offerings) with WLS. To just name two.

    --
    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re:Wow! by dmehus Friday October 03 2003, @12:01PM
    Ya, Right
    by Anonymous on Friday October 03 2003, @11:58AM (#12376)
    "The service has been well received by millions of Internet users who appreciate getting navigation tools as opposed to the 'dead end' of an error message," added Lewis.

    I have yet to hear "One" person outside of VeriSign and Overture say sitefinder is a good idea.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Thanks to the Internet Community
    by Anonymous on Friday October 03 2003, @12:15PM (#12379)
    Like "most" others who opposed the sitefinder "service", I just want to say thanks to the Internet community for voicing their opinions.

    I doubt ICANN would have acted with so much expediency had the community not spoken out so passionately.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Non-Registry Service? FAR WORSE ABUSE
    by GeorgeK on Friday October 03 2003, @12:17PM (#12381)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/

    I think this is a brand new tactic on the part of VeriSign, to categorize it as a "non-registry service".

    That seems to escalate things to a new level, in that it seems to be an admission of abusing their monopoly in the Registry for the provision of a NON-REGISTRY SERVICE.

    It had been my understanding that previously their position would have been that it would have been categorized as a Registry service, but one that didn't need approval due to it being "free" (i.e. needs no contract amendment). However, giving advantage for the provision of a non-registry service seems to be MUCH WORSE. Suppose that NON-REGISTRY SERVICE was a REGISTRAR SERVICE, for example, and VeriSign abused its monopoly to advantage one of their partners in that space? Can someone say "WLS"?

    Clearly, VeriSign's abusive and monopolistic business practises need to be examined at the highest levels of government and by regulators.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Dodge political battles with technical fixes
    by odonnell (michael_odonnell@acm.org) on Friday October 03 2003, @12:20PM (#12382)
    User #3447 Info | http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
    while the Internet has been used for innovative purposes over the last decade, the core infrastructure has suffered from a lack of innovation

    On the contrary, the core infrastructure has prospered from the lack of innovation---at least the lack of semantic/commercial/political innovation in the infrastructure. The basic Internet infrastructure has remained mostly neutral by being primitive, and indifferent to the meanings of the messages. Verisign's introduction of real-world semantics at the infrastructural level of DNS degrades the value of the semantically neutral infrastructure, whether their semantic ideas are good or not. Real world semantics simply doesn't belong at the DNS level.

    So, we need to take a step backwards with DNS infrastructure, and provide a system of meaningless handles that are entirely free of meaning. DNS is a portable address service, not a semantically driven "navigation tool." A semantics-free DNS using meaningless handles would provide a neutral infrastructure on top of which Verisign and others could compete to provide meaningful navigational tools and other services.

    Bob Frankston has already explained [circleid.com] how an institution running a large name server could put a neutral DNS could online tomorrow, within a 3d-level domain of the current DNS. It's time to just do it.

    Mike O'Donnell
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • True by GeorgeK Friday October 03 2003, @01:27PM
      • Re:True by cambler Friday October 03 2003, @01:31PM
        • Re:True by dmehus Friday October 03 2003, @03:03PM
          • Re:True by cambler Friday October 03 2003, @06:13PM
            • Re:True by Anonymous Saturday October 04 2003, @09:29AM
              • Re:True by cambler Saturday October 04 2003, @10:43AM
          • Re:True by fnord Saturday October 04 2003, @03:39PM
            • Re:True by dmehus Saturday October 04 2003, @10:22PM
        • Re:True by Anonymous Saturday October 04 2003, @07:17PM
          • Re:True by dmehus Sunday October 05 2003, @01:06PM
            • Re:True by Anonymous Sunday October 05 2003, @07:46PM
    It's still on
    by phoffman@proper.com on Friday October 03 2003, @03:04PM (#12388)
    User #2063 Info
    As of 4PM PST, they are still resolving bogus names. So, maybe they're waiting until the last possible moment to turn it off. Sheesh.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Stability of the internet
    by Anonymous on Saturday October 04 2003, @10:31AM (#12398)
    "there is no data to indicate that the core operation of the Domain Name System or stability of the Internet has been adversely affected"
    Uh...bullshit. My spam-load both at home and at work has tripled since they started mucking about with the DNS, not to mention the trouble I've had with scripts and monitoring systems suddenly breaking.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com