Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    VeriSign's SiteFinder & ICANN Contracts--A Second Opinion | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 23 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    I like your suggestion
    by KarlAuerbach on Thursday September 25 2003, @06:05PM (#12301)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    Your suggestion makes a lot of sense.

    If one looks at the totality of what a domain name registrant typically wants when he/she/it buys a domain name, it is the fact that a person out here on the world-wide-web will find a web server via a DNS A record under the registered name. And that is precisely what Verisign has granted to itself with SiteFinder.

    Yes, there are other aspects of domain name ownership - such as the ability to establish TXT records or NAPTR records - but those are small-potatoes kinds of aspects as compared to the huge aspect of the A record.

    Thus I would agree that for all intents and purposes, at least as measured by the dominant portion of internet users and domain name customers, Verisign has become the effective owner of the domain name.

    By-the-way, a good example of a typo would be to use "www.go0gle.com - with the second letter "o" changed to the digit zero. What makes this example interesting is that Verisign is presenting a search page, not unlike that offered by Google itself, to customers who mistype Google's name. In that case it would seem that Verisign could be said to be pawing itself as if it is Google.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Looks good to me
    by jon on Sunday September 28 2003, @04:27AM (#12315)
    User #20 Info
    It's a good idea. I hadn't thought of it, but it sounds right. -- jon

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Missing somthing
    by phoffman@proper.com on Sunday September 28 2003, @03:05PM (#12316)
    User #2063 Info
    Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't SiteFinder a functional assignment by VeriSign of all previously-nonregistered domain names to itself?

    Yup, you are missing something. In order for a name to be assigned, it needs name servers. If you ask for the name servers of any of the nonregistered domain names that VeriSign now "serves" with SiteFinder, they have no NS records.

    If you squint hard, yes, this is "owning" the domain names, but only if you ignore the definitions set down in the standards. VeriSign carefully followed the standards (to the point of even putting an actual wildcard record in the zone files).

    All VeriSign is doing is (a) breaking the assumptions that the world makes about TLDs, and (b) proving that ICANN is unable to act effectively (or at all!) when it obviously should be.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com