| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
VeriSign's SiteFinder & ICANN Contracts--A Second Opinion
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
And there are also disreputable used car sellers that turn back the odometer on a used car to make it look more like new... and then there is the case of "new" cars been driven by employees with the odometer disconnected. All of which is considered fraud and a criminal offense in many parts of the world.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re:I like your suggestion
by finee
|
|
|
 |
Unless you have proof that VeriSign IS committing fraud, I do not see how this is relevant. If the argument is to be made that an organization cannot run a TLD because they may commit fraud, then nobody will run it. Even non-profits can commit fraud.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|