| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Why Verisign Isn't Worried
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
If it can be made "legal", perhaps some protest is in order?
wewantour404(.com|.net)
I mean, how can it be legal if one organization holds 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999999999999999999999997% of all .com-domains (not even mentioning .net) ?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Still, ICANN should start these processes now, even if it eventually loses and even if it collapses as a result. Unless ICANN takes a principle-based stand now, regardless of how flimsy the contractual or financial basis, it it will be increasingly ignored. At this point it has two choices : (1) sit on its hands and become (even more) sidelined, (2) act in accordance with its awowed principles and gain some respect.
Evidence of sidelining abounds. Verisign clearly thinks it can ignore ICANN. The RIRs are already preparing to sideline ICANN [ripe.net]. CENTR secured a ccNSO charter allowing it to ignore ICANN when it doesn't like what it says.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
