| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Dan's Dispute Resolution Procedure (DDRP)
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 58 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
the fact that ICANN has not moved forward with registry competition (TLD expansion) shows that UDRP has proven to be part of an unstable solution in protecting Intellectual Property as this relates to registrations at the second level. There is really no other conclusion to draw than this. It's not so much that every case brought before UDRP must be judged "correctly" (as no system is perfect all of the time), it's a matter that the UDRP mechanism in general does not provide the type of stable environment necessary to allow market place competition. For this reason, I am not sure how anyone can state that "UDRP works well". In fact, it is a statement that is not possible to be true otherwise IP concerns would be considered properly addressed and competition moving forward.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: Dan's Dispute Resolution Procedure (DDRP)
by RFassett
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
