| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Verisign typo-squats
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 54 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
You're obviously not really Jim Rutt. But your point brings up the issue: why should the anti-spam coders be forced to make this change? And, at that, what happens when Verisign changes those IP addresses, which they will surely do at some point in the future. Why burden those who relied on a function of the protocol with now having to monitor which IP addresses Verisign uses?
I'm not arguing for or against this - just pointing out issues.
--
Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - Re:Choices?
by jimrutt
Tuesday September 16 2003, @10:46AM
- Re:Choices?
by cambler
Friday September 19 2003, @08:55PM
- Re:Choices?
by jimrutt
Monday September 22 2003, @09:23AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|