ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Verisign typo-squats | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 54 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    This is so Wrong!
    by Dangerman on Tuesday September 16 2003, @12:25PM (#12219)
    User #3841 Info
    I don't like this at all.
    They are supposed to manage the dns, not turn it into a moneymaking machine for theirself. It wouldn't be so bad if they made millions without hurting anyone, but they will be making money at the expense of many other people who depend on the internet for their income. They will be filtering money out of many people's pockets, and funneling it into their own pockets.

    Also, what changes will they make to their pages in the future? Who's going to complain when they make small changes in their favor?

    They have been trusted to manage the DNS, ...to be in charge of using it in a manner fair to everyone. Now they have given one company the ability to profit from all unregistered domains. ...that company being theirself. How is that fair? How is it fair to profit from the traffic from a domain without paying for it? Now if that domain brings them in 10 cents during a year, it's profitable for them, because they pay 0 cents for it. With no registration costs, they can offer services from domain traffic, cheaper than anyone else can. How can anyone else compete with that? Where's the level playing field? It costs me about $10 a year to use the traffic from a domain, and I have to pay for it before I can find out if it's profitable. It costs them $0 a year, and they will know in advance which domains will be profitable, before they buy it. Plus they can sell their traffic for much less and drive me and many other people out of business. I may be forced to give up my domain, because it won't be profitable for me to renew it. If I don't renew it, and it expires, it will automatically be a profit maker for Verisign. This reminds me of Enron.
    This is also unfair in another way. What if Verisign did this from the beginning? Can you imagine all the high traffic domains they or their friends would own by now? With the information they will have, on which domains get the most traffic, who do you think will register them? Who do you think will be buying the best traffic domains from now on? Do you think when they see a domain making them $1,000 a year, they will let it sit there, unregistered, taking the chance that someone else might register it? Many people work full time looking for good domains to buy. They do their research, pay the registration fee, and hope the domain has typein traffic. Now verisign, with their inside information, can easily put them out of business.

    They are using the position they have been entrusted with to gain a huge unfair advantage over many businesses and people working from home. They have shown that they are not capable of managing the DNS fairly and should have that responsibility taken away, immediately!

    This is big business taking over the internet at the expense of smaller players, not a responsible company managing the DNS.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:This is so Wrong!
    by jberryhill on Tuesday September 16 2003, @04:26PM (#12222)
    User #3013 Info
    You are absolutely correct on the value of competitive intelligence being reaped by Verisign on what are the most valuable unregistered domains in terms of traffic.

    It is not a mistake that this action precedes WLS.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com