| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
What's Worse Than WIPO? (Hint - they're doing .kids.us)
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 2 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
This is a little off-topic, but I was wondering:
I recently read this at the UDRP provider accreditation page:
[Applicants must provide ICANN with] "A description of how the applicant intends to publish decisions of panels in proceedings it administers and a commitment to provide ICANN with copies of all portions of decisions of panels not published." Link [icann.org]
Anyone know anything about this? Are there unpublished decisions around - and why would ICANN envisage a system where some decisions wouldn't be published?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea was that parties should have a way to protect trade secrets by asking the panel to redact some info if needed. AFAIK this provision has never been used.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
