ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    What's in .NAME? 5000+ .NAME Registrations Not Conforming to .NAME Restrictions | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 185 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: What's in .NAME? 5000+ .NAME Registrations No
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday May 31 2002, @07:28AM (#6607)
    User #2810 Info
    Actually 241 if one counts those names Ben didn't at first explicitly flag as non-conforming. It's so heartwarming to see a local (to ICANNWatch, recently) lad make the top 5 [snif].

    Concerned that that number might be misleading and that it might include his actual name, I did a quick scan of Adrian's 241 names looking for his own name in some variant or another. Here's the count on the number of times each of his three known names show up within his registered .names, what those names are, and whether or not Ben explicitly flagged them as nonconforming:

    Adrian 0

    Paul 6
    sir.jamespaulmccartney.name (flagged)
    sir.james-paul-mccartney.name(flagged)
    sir.paulmccartney.name (flagged)
    sir.paul-mccartney.name (flagged)
    sirjames.paulmccartney.name (not flagged)
    sirjamespaul.mccartney.name (not flagged)

    Miles 2
    the.miles.name (flagged)
    a.miles.name (not flagged)

    And just for grins and because I have too much time on my hands (NOT!), I thought he might appear elsewhere in .name so I did WHOIS queries on:

    adrian.miles.name (still available)
    paul.miles.name (still available)
    adrian-paul.miles.name (still available)
    adrianpaul.miles.name (still available)
    adrian.paul-miles.name (still available)
    sir.adrian-paul-miles.name (still available)

    Perhaps his Knighthood is lost in the mails. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: What's in .NAME? 5000+ .NAME Registrations No by fnord
    Re: What's in .NAME? 5000+ .NAME Registrations No
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday May 31 2002, @12:44PM (#6628)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    That is actually quite funny and a good joke! (LOL)

    Just for the record, any visitor to my site (http://www.ad2000d.com/ will see that ALL of my McCartney .NAMES are available for transfer FREE OF CHARGE to Sir Paul McCartney ONLY, as are my Duran Duran related .NAMES available FREE OF CHARGE ONLY to members of the recently reformed Duran Duran... Oh yes, and any British Royal Family .NAMES are also available FREE OF CHARGE to the respective Royal Highnesses, such as HRH The Queen, HRH Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry, etc...

    Any visitor to my site will also see I am offering three domains to support the victims of the WTC Disaster. Any genuine charity involved in the support work or memorial building/rebuilding is welcome to apply for any of these .NAME, again FREE OF CHARGE.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: More great research
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday May 31 2002, @08:15AM (#6613)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    I don't see how this guy registering a lot of stupid .name domains makes the whole TLD "worthless"... I can still use dan.tobias.name for its intended purpose, as can any other individual; if a cybersquatter had registered it first, I could challenge him/her/them using the policy in effect. The existence of various stupid non-names in the namespace has no effect on me.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: More great research
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday May 31 2002, @11:26AM (#6617)
    User #2810 Info
    1

    Read the rest of this comment...

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: More great research
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday May 31 2002, @12:46PM (#6629)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    They haven't said that. Only you have and you're totally wrong!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: What's in .NAME?
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Saturday June 01 2002, @12:20PM (#6687)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    funny thing is, I actually have chronic M.E. syndrome - which is C.F.S for the uninformed - there are courtesy links to support organisation for the illness on my site.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com