ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Can the United Nations Improve ICANN? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 3 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Surprised?
    by ldg on Friday July 25 2003, @02:41AM (#12004)
    User #2935 Info | http://example.com/
    Is there any surprise here? Business interests are the reason behind ICANN's actions and policies - big business, that is. There's nothing new in this report. It just states the obvious, IMO.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    WASSUP with WSIS?
    by Anonymous on Friday July 25 2003, @06:14AM (#12005)
    As a person in the know explained to me recently, after the September 1999 meetings at WIPO the plan of the various United Nations organizations was to divide the internet governance up roughly in the following way: WIPO for dispute resolution ITU for technical standards UNCITRAL for "plug in" law making. The problem was the OECD which had a bailiwick (consumer protection and stealth US presence) that overlapped with many of these areas. Also, Ira Magaziner was against this intergovernmental structure. So different approaches have been taken to the same problem over the past years. Most recently, the newly created ccSupportOrganization is a temporary way station (some hope) on the road to the evolution of ICANN into an intergovernmental entity under the ITU. WSIS is an ITU creation which represents another aspect of ITU's ongoing and aggressive efforts to gain complete control of the tasks that ICANN does. Whether or not ITU does take over ICANN's work, I have very little faith - based on the complete lack of independence and discipline in the UDRP and what I saw in ICANN Montreal - that anyone (governmental, civil society, whatever) without any power or money such as a humble At-Large Member or legacy At-Large Member will be heard (or interests of these lower denizens of the food chain of stakeholders protected) in any manner by any of these structures. In ICANN or in ITU the average Joe and Jane will be locked out by all those control freaks seeking to make sure that power, money and prestige flows to them and their companies. After four years of watching this stuff, I think it is an illusion to think that any efforts at reform will do more than reshuffle interests in a way that always will preserve the interests of the most powerful to the detriment of anyone else who does not think like them. It just becomes a boring battle between elites for domination instead of something more meaningful. All comments are captured to be used by one side or another in the battle. I wish there was some other way to get out of this alphabet soup of acronyms and really take advantage of the connectivity we have on the Internet. As they use to say, Trust nobody. There is something happening here; What it is ain't exactly clear. Best, Ben
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Can the UN improve ICANN
    by vasconcelos on Tuesday July 29 2003, @12:52PM (#12010)
    User #3149 Info
    I think the problem lays on the definition of the relevant stakeholders, of their representation and of who should decide such matters. That is what has been haunting ICANN from the begining.
    I have no idea how to solve those problems but I wonder if an intergovernmental organization is not the least of all evils. ICANN as an experimental alternative has proven worse.
    I know that the UN is an intergovernamental organization, and some question its representativeness.
    Hence, we are in desperate need of alternatives and not of nice whishfull thinking declarations.
    The present situation certainly favours interst groups because there are no mechanisms to check their strength.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com