ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Registrar Reserved names in the .info Sunrise process | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 14 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Rape of the 'Rushers
    by Anonymous on Wednesday July 16 2003, @11:27PM (#11972)
    Easy to see how the words "nudes, foot, ethos, angels, and sick" et al are good fits to the domain registration biz, no? Perdon, "sick" Si! A fave: "yourbra". The "Dot"(TM) org door prize for a job well done. Suggest well documented research on sunrise concerns be forwarded to Scotland Yard, FBI, RCMP and Interpol et cetera. Afilias, what say thee? Amicus Curiae-ous
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    domain.info, Lubsen/Fogel Screw Consumers
    by Anonymous on Friday July 18 2003, @05:03AM (#11977)
    domains.info and domain.info Check the whois, Lubsen and Fogel screw consumers.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    We're Registrars! We can grab the names first!
    by Anonymous on Friday July 18 2003, @04:35PM (#11980)

    Heather Carle is on record as saying that every one of the "Registrar Reserved" names were QUOTE: "hand-checked".

    In defence of Hal Lubsen (who I have criticised on many scores previously) I must mention that I checked to see if he had an up and running FortKnox.com site at the time of the .info Sunrise, and he did indeed have a website operating at this site.

    The real criticism, though, and I think Jeff Davies makes this point, is:

    Why should the Registrars get first pick of domain names, to the exclusion of other people?

    I thought the whole point of the Sunrise was to enable IP claimants access to these names, so how do you justify letting the "suppliers" nip in first and take them, instead of "supplying" them... which, forgive me, I thought was the purpose of a Registrar!

    With reference to Signature domains, I'm bound to allude once again to their performance in the .biz2B, where they submitted an incredibly short list of names, for just one customer (their own Partner Joshua Blacker)... thereby effectively queue-jumping the general public, because the round-robin system favoured the shortest queues possible.

    I phoned Joshua about this extraordinary policy, and he admitted he was a Signature partner in whose name nine fantastic names had been acquired, but he told me "You should speak to Barry because he knows what this is all about, I don't really know anything."

    This was one of a host of issues I raised with ICANN-Registrar Liaison Dan Halloran, 425 days ago, and I am deeply disappointed that he has *never* even had the courtesy to reply to me.

    What is the point of "ICANN accreditation"? What is the point of ICANN Agreements (when, for example, Lubsen's DomainBank broke the Afilias rules, even though Hal Lubsen was Afilias CEO)? Amazingly DomainBank charged $15000 to a customer, to submit ineligible applications which broke Afilias's rules, and which were therefore valueless. Another member of the Afilias cartel - Speednames - charged $500,000 to submit 4981 ineligible Sunrise applications.

    It seems to me that what we have here is a system which is set up to serve the suppliers rather than the consumers.

    In this light, it is entirely logical that Registrars were allowed "first pick" of the .info names.

    And in the context of fraud and corruption which ran far deeper than anything cited here, I suppose it is entirely logical that Dan Halloran has refused to respond to my fair and serious concerns, because ...

    ... ICANN has no defence.

    yrs,

    Richard Henderson

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Offensive conduct
    by Anonymous on Friday July 18 2003, @10:50PM (#11981)
    From the looks of things, it appears some registrars felt they could act with impunity and did not heed clear rules. Henry, the question is: why? Shouldn't reston your laurels.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Websites vs domain names
    by ldg on Saturday July 19 2003, @06:51AM (#11982)
    User #2935 Info | http://example.com/
    Although it is obvious that registrars abused the so-called Sunrise policy for registrations, I fail to see the necessity of publishing websites for any domain name if a registrant chooses not to do so. Domain names are used for many things besides websites and the fact that the public is ignorant of those uses is no excuse for the expectation of websites or content. Domain names are often used for provision of sublevel domains for users, email only, hostname conventions, and other non-website uses. A typical hostname use might be [dns.acorp.info], [ns.acorp.info], [sales.acorp.info], [archives.acorp.info], [somedept.acorp.info] [intranet.acorp.info]... The examples could also represent third level domains offered to acorp's users or a primary domain for just email accounts [myname.emailcorp.info], [yourname.emailcorp.info], [mail-listname.emailcorp.info]...

    Nothing requires having a website in order to use a domain.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Why do corrupt cowards not reply?
    by WIPOorgUK on Saturday July 19 2003, @10:48AM (#11985)
    User #3146 Info | http://wipo.org.uk/
    Many small businesses share the same words as big business with trademark.

    Giving Registrars and Trademarks priority in Sunrise Period is violation of Antitrust Law.

    Can one single Lawyer deny this hard FACT?

    The people at Afilias and ICANN also abridge the common persons choice of words with this unlawful scheme.

    They and tight-lipped Lawyers are all pathetic cowards.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Keith Lubsen's registration of angels.info
    by JeffD on Sunday July 20 2003, @10:40AM (#11990)
    User #3702 Info
    A possible explanation for Keith Lubsen's registration of angels.info is provided by a report at http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/DailyNews/mo rphine0601.html which, for some reason, reports the support of Mr Lubsen for a Dr Robert Weitzel who was accused of the murder of 5 elderly patients under his care. The doctor was convicted and jailed but later released and acquitted on retrial.

    Killer or angel of mercy was the question asked by the report - and perhaps one that Mr Lubsen wished to address using his acquisition of angels.info. Clearly a wholly legitimate use of a registrar's ability to reserve domain names for their own use prior to them being available to the general public!

    Jeff Davies
    j@jduk.com
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Owner-Operator
    by Anonymous on Sunday August 03 2003, @07:50PM (#12022)
    The NYSE is being probed for conflict of interest.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com