| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
DotOrg PR push on Validation
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 11 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Bret is a consultant for the DotOrg Foundation.
What he also doesn't point out is that nearly all of the 5 or so nonprofits that endorsed their bid are in the BUSINESS of offering validations and would stand to benefit from the proposal.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
Gartner is hardly a .org kind of entity either.
I have heard rumors that the Gartner Group wasn't exactly disinterested - the rumor is that among the applicants that were evaluated were some who are Gartner customers.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
Bret:
The evaluation team's report made some very specific arguments as to why it has doubts about the validation proposal.
It's disappointing that your post here, and DotOrg in general, has chosen to attack the team rather than answer those arguments. If the report can be shown to be erroneous in some way, it is not too late to change it.
Let's try one more time. DotOrg proposes to sell "buttons" to .org registrants that say "I am a validated nonprofit" for display on their web site. The NCDNHC report points out that DotOrg could sell these buttons now, or at any time in the future, regardless of who is operating the registry of .org. There is no reason to link that service to control of the registry --UNLESS there is some intent to use validation as a basis for restricting entry into the domain.
Can you tell me what is false about that argument?
--M
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|