ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Analysis of .info Sunrise Registrations | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 26 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Very interesting
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Tuesday July 08 2003, @10:22PM (#11905)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    I am not very surprised. What I find very interesting is that the few applicants in the first 'round' of selections who specifically declined to have a sunrise provision were immediately dismissed.

    The .WEB application by IO Design, if I recall, correctly _predicted_ these problems in advance, as part of their rejection of sunrise.

    At every turn, ICANN's decisions, and the decisions and behaviours of the 'winners' are proven to be mistakes. When will ICANN remedy this by allowing more honest and ethical competition, I wonder?

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Gross Distortions Here
    by Anonymous on Wednesday July 09 2003, @04:45AM (#11906)
    You have significant inaccuracies in your story with regard to Mr. Palage. Mr Palage was not affiliated in any way with any TLD proposing company during his tenure as Chair of Working group "B". The working group "b" report was presented in April of 2000 and the RFP for new TLD's was not even issued until late in the Summer of 2000.. Mr Palage was, at the time he was chairing the working group, a principal in a registrar company. Misrepresentations like the one made in this story are incredibly irresponsible. Its sad that the editors of icannwatch aren't a bit more careful in allowing gross misstatements like this to appear.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Adding To That ...
    by Anonymous on Wednesday July 09 2003, @06:21AM (#11907)
    True, .info is saturated with defensive registrations by trademark holders, most of which will be held dormant, providing no new content. It's sad, and obviously hurts .info's recognition. Equally true is the fact that domain speculators have legitimately registered hoards of .info's, warehousing them until inflated offers come pouring in. These warehoused names are also mostly dormant, providing no new content. This also hurts .info's recognition. The trademark holders will always hold on to their defensive registrations, and will only brand under the .info TLD if and when .info is ever widely used. Speculators will hold on to their registrations until .info is widely used, making the warehoused names more valuable. ICANN's ponderous policies have created TLDs which aren't being used, and provide only microscopic amounts of new content. ICANN said it wanted a new gTLD to compete with .com. Instead, it engineered a new gTLD with stunted growth, and almose ZERO public awareness. This is an abysmal failure, and ICANN ought to recognize that fact.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Here's The Kicker
    by Anonymous on Wednesday July 09 2003, @06:24AM (#11908)
    What do you expect? ICANN owns ICANN.INFO, but doesn't use it! The URL www.icann.info resolves nowhere! It's not even forwarded to ICANN.com or ICANN.org! ICANN doesn't use .info, why should anyone else?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    authoritative?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Wednesday July 09 2003, @03:28PM (#11911)
    User #2810 Info
    The article claims that:
    It has been authoritatively estimated that some 0.000269% of domain name registrations result from attempted cybersquatting
    and provides a link to an ICANN forum post by Dr. Mueller. In fact that is not at all what was claimed, the linked to quote actually states:
    Currently, trademark-disputed registrations are filed at a rate approximately 0.000269 of monthly domain name registrations.
    which is an entirely different thing. Further, I don't know that Dr. Mueller is claiming to be an authoritative source on this, and if he is, there are other sources I consider more authoritative who put cybersquatting rates much higher.

    This article does seem to show quite clearly that there is no great demand (and apparently little need) for new relatively open and undifferentiated gTLDs. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com