| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Analysis of .info Sunrise Registrations
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 26 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Christopher,
I too have wondered why so many applicants saw their $50,000 disappear into the ICANN coffers and meekly walked away when their proposals did not meet ICANN's flawed IP scrutiny.
If it can be shown that ICANN's Sunrise policy was not the result of concensus - and therefore contrary to its policy-making rules - and if it can also be shown to be an unlawful policy - as was the advice of the Chief Counsel of the US Government's Small Business Administration - then I would think that a cause of action would not be too difficult to establish.
I will be happy to share some fairly extensive research into the subject with anyone with the gonads to want to pursue such an action (or is everyone forcing a smile and vainly hoping that ICANN will be dumb enough to release further gTLDs in the future?)
Jeff Davies
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Cause of Action
by JeffD
|
|
1 reply beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|