| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Springtime for ICANN
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 2 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I was fascinated by the passage: "It is about whether and when and why we may need a few global rules for the DNS, and finding the version of those rules on which most affected parties can agree."
The reason those particular words struck me is that ITU is all about determining by consensus whether and when and why we may need a few global rules for telecommunications, and finding the version of those rules on which all affected parties can agree.
Which of course does not imply that ITU should "take over" ICANN or anything like that.
Best,
Richard Hill
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|