ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WLS Approved, With Amendments | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: WLS Approved, With Amendments
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Sunday August 25 2002, @01:25AM (#8693)
    User #2810 Info
    I don't know if I'm directly addressing your point Ray, but the way I see it is we've had a monopoly (VeriSign) replaced with a trust (ICANN) of three major players, with VeriSign still penultimate. At this rate we may have true competition sometime around 2050. The only answer I see to this is the courts, and if the disaffected can't get their act together to sue, then I guess we might as well hold our breath for a few decades until it shakes itself out. Frankly, I'm disgusted that no-one has stepped up to the plate and challenged this, but if they're that wimpy I guess they're not worthy of running a registry. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: WLS Approved, With Amendments by fnord
    Re: WLS Approved, With Amendments
    by RFassett on Sunday August 25 2002, @06:47AM (#8695)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    My guess is that the scope of the registry contracts will start to come crashing down when the registries begin to challenge them - most notably those things regulatory in nature such as wholesale pricing. I think we just saw this with WLS and ICANN backed down rather than have the scope of this contract challenged by Verisign and reviewed in a court of law (opening the possibility for a decentralized and authoritative third party setting any sort of clear and concise boundary as this relates to ICANN's legal right to regulate registry product service offerings).

    I believe ICANN has avoided this by "approving" WLS but that regulatory price controls are next on Verisign's plate. With WLS, now we shall see (if anything) what the registrars do. But clearly, to me, ICANN has been legally advised to face the latter rather than the former. If certain registrars will indeed be harmed by WLS, any type of legal action should be soley with Verisign and not involving ICANN. Should legal action involve ICANN as a party, language involved in its contracts will then be subject to authoritative interpretation regarding its scope and boundary.

    Certainly artificially limiting the number of top level registries is a regulatory act in and of itself. I am not sure it can be proven in a court of law that ICANN is restricting the number of TLD's as an act of market regulation (where a court could then determine by precedent this act as being outside of its scope).

    Regarding the 37 applicants that were turned down in the first round, they have no contract with ICANN to challenge before any sort of third party mechanism....the very same concept the ccTLD registries seem to favor as well.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com