ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    EURID chosen as registry for .eu | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Should countries in .eu lose their ccTLDs?
    by dmehus on Friday May 23 2003, @08:21AM (#11720)
    User #3626 Info | http://doug.mehus.info/
    I agree with Karl. It's like with two kids, if you give one a creamsicle, you have to give the other one a creamsicle. So, allowing EU Member States to keep their own ccTLD in addition to .eu is only fair if you give NATO member countries a .nato TLD. Or, North American countries a .na TLD (or similar variant as .na is likely taken by Namibia or something).

    Best,
    Doug
    Doug Mehus http://doug.mehus.info/ [mehus.info]
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Should countries in .eu lose their ccTLDs? by dmehus
    Re:Should countries in .eu lose their ccTLDs?
    by Anonymous on Saturday May 24 2003, @07:07AM (#11736)
    Why?

    As far as I know, NATO hasn't asked for, and doesn't need its own TLD. It seems to be quite content with nato.int. In fact the largest single part of NATO, the US military, already has its own TLD, .mil. (Which should really be .mil.us if you ask me.)

    And do you *really* think there's a need for .na (north america)? I don't. It'd be less successful than even .name. The US doesn't even seem to manage to use its own ccTLD very much.

    And the US has no reason to whine. It already has .gov and .mil, and is the predominant user of .edu. No reason to whine when the EU, 370 million people currently, a common borderless market of 15 + 10 + 3 countries, gets a much needed TLD based on an ISO 3166 reservation.

    Now the EU is a schizofrenic organization. In some areas, the member countries are independent, in other areas, like trade, they are one firm block. An example: The EU has one single delegation to the WTO.

    So in some instances, it is appropriate to use the national domain. Often because of the language thing. Or because its a national function that isn't coordinated by the EU.

    In other cases, it is natural to use the .eu domain. Like websites for the European branch office of some multinational company. It is one common market, after all.

    The EU is a special case in the world. It is a reason why it is reserved on the ISO 3166 list. There is a real logistical need for the designation. And there is a practical need for the TLD, which I think will probably be quite successful, easily drawing more registrations that say .info.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com