| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ALAC May Not Be Representative, But it Can Still Be Right
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 2 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
It's pretty easy for a group of people who don't represent Internet users (or domain name owners, or whatever) to come out with statements that match those of people who disagree with ICANN. So what? They should be spending 100% of their time on the difficult (possibly impossible) task of proving that they can represent who they are supposed to. Until then, they're just going to be singing to the choir (that's us).
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
