| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ALAC May Not Be Representative, But it Can Still Be Right
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 2 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I have generally been very impressed with the quality of the Interim ALAC's submissions on policy issues. There has been little I disagree with and they have expressed common sense views is a forceful yet not antagonistic manner.
Naturally I support that ALAC should be elected as a bottom up process but do note that organisations which have tried to organise bottom up such as IDNO and icannatlarge.org have spent months and years discussing process and almost never producing policy statements, while ALAC have done basically the opposite.
Perhaps there is a sensible middle ground somewhere? Not to say that I agree with all ALAC has done - the draft criteria for RALOs are unworkable, but the policy submissions have been good.
DPF
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
