ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Amen to That! | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Why more needed?
    by Anonymous on Saturday May 17 2003, @04:28AM (#11669)
    I just don't understand. We have infinite domains available now; we'll have infinite domains available after any number of new TLDs are added. Just seems like a waste of time for everyone, to add more TLDs. Is it just that the rars want an excuse to charge companies more money to protect their trademarks?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Why more needed?
    by RFassett on Saturday May 17 2003, @01:24PM (#11671)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    "...infinite domains available now"

    there is the thought that second level domains that make no sense or are impossible to pronounce in its native language sort of defeats the purpose for which DNS functionality was invented...in this light, "infinite" is a bit of a stretch at the second level, no?

    It is highly impractical (I won't say impossible) today for every Internet user to participate with the Internet by way of a second level domain name registration that makes sense and able to be pronounced, a fairly basic objective in my mind relative to the DNS invention...people talk about "end user confusion"...personally, I favor balancing "confusion" to the extent participation on-demand (complete with a value equation) is not compromised. Today, we are not close...and to me defines "stop energy" as this pertains to the DNS arena and its inherent functionaliy and purpose.

    This does not mean, to me, that the trademark issue should be ignored and in fact has not been by way of UDRP and Sunrise policies, both very cost effective, opt-in procedures at the determination of each trademark holder. The fact that opting in to these procedures involves a cost that is above zero is not, to me, a reason to stop energy...there are what, 650M Internet users today and maybe 30M unique registrants at best? That's a 5% ratio. Is this considered satisfactory? If so, then fine. If not, then how does the trend become reversed? What would the Internet be like at 30%? We just do not know other than, and correct me if I am wrong, there is no technical reason to find this out.

    The potential for increased end-user confusion is one outcome (or should I call this "dilution" just so that I am clear to all audiences). It is a concept or trade-off that most reasonable people recognize...but to stop energy at all costs when user participation is expected to double *again* within 5 years or so simply for the reason of "possible confusion" makes me wonder if DNS functionality (the assignment of names to numbers) should just simply be outlawed all together then. That is the logic, right? Just eliminate DNS and we avoid all possible end-user confusion as the Internet becomes piped in to the tune of 1.5B people world wide over the next 60-72 months...or do we accept the status quo of DNS (stop energy) and watch the DNS ratio decline to 2% or less? Personally, I would like to see 1.5B and 30% in a method carried out by responsible parties with reasonable planning and what this produces for everyone but understand that I have mostly been in the minority of such thinking.

    Ray
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com