| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Auerbach Weighs in for gTLD Lotteries
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 49 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Any new TLD should only go to a registry OBLIGATED, by contract and enforcement, to vigorously advertise and market said TLD, regardless of initial sales numbers.
Afilias and Neulevel are disregarding their promises to advertise, screwing every customer who bought names in those extensions, figuring Afilias and Neulevel would at least do what they promised. But ICANN doesn't give a flying fuck if these registries follow through with their promises, at the expense of the consumers who bought into those extensions figuring the registries would at very least adhere to their registry agreements. Someone ought to remind that prick Abril i Abril just what happened after he turned chicken and abstained from all those hard decisions back in November 2000. Did we spell his name correctly here? We're sure he'll watch for that ...
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - Re:It's A Huge Problem
by lsolum
Monday April 07 2003, @08:27PM
- Re:It's A Huge Problem
by Anonymous
Tuesday April 08 2003, @05:43PM
- Re:It's A Huge Problem
by lsolum
Tuesday April 08 2003, @08:20PM
- Re:It's A Huge Problem
by Anonymous
Wednesday April 09 2003, @08:04AM
- Pyramid Schemes
by lsolum
Wednesday April 09 2003, @09:58AM
- Re:Pyramid Schemes
by Anonymous
Wednesday April 09 2003, @10:16AM
- Re:Pyramid Schemes
by Anonymous
Wednesday April 09 2003, @10:55AM
- Re:Pyramid Schemes
by lsolum
Wednesday April 09 2003, @01:26PM
- Looks like a:pyramid scheme to me
by fnord
Thursday April 10 2003, @10:08AM
- End of Pyramid Scheme Discussion
by lsolum
Thursday April 10 2003, @10:31AM
- Not Quite the End of Pyramid Scheme Discussion :)
by fnord
Thursday April 10 2003, @11:40AM
- Re:End of Pyramid Scheme Discussion
by Anonymous
Thursday April 10 2003, @02:30PM
- Apologies to Fnord & More on Pyramids
by lsolum
Thursday April 10 2003, @05:10PM
- Re:Apologies to Fnord & More on Pyramids
by Anonymous
Thursday April 10 2003, @06:30PM
- Re:Apologies to Fnord & More on Pyramids
by Anonymous
Friday April 11 2003, @03:45AM
- Re:Apologies to Fnord & More on Pyramids
by fnord
Friday April 11 2003, @10:41AM
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|