| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
'ICANN strikes a blow against UCE'
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 9 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
Mueller: you've got this backwards. The anti-spam crusaders aren't concerned with the forged e-mail address the spam says it's "from"; they look up the Whois data for the website being advertised in the spam. Go back and look at those spams again and check the link the spammer was trying to get you to click. The spammer obviously wouldn't want to "forge" that address, altough he might try to obscure it. Is the Whois data for the "spamvertized" domain accurate?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:ICANN's policy has nothing to do with UCE
by Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
|
If these websites are accused of fraud or some other illegal activity (such as cluttering my mailbox, which may not actually be illegal) why can't their records be subpeona'd from the registrar? Why are we trying to adapt WHOIS to a purpose it was not intended for, creating huge externalities for everyone else who registers a domain name?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
