| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Exclusion by Confusion
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 10 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
Would it be correct to assume that it is "not within our ability to propose solutions outside the boundaries of [the ALAC's Report to the Evolution and Reform Committee]? (reference http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0208/msg00918.html.
> Can ICANN make this less complex, easier to understand?
ie, help us sugarcoat it.
> (Suggestions can be sent to reform-comments@icann.org).
ie, contribute to ICANN's dog-and-pony show of "bottoms up" participation.
The poster didn't write anonymously - but neither did he identify himself as one of the authors of the report he appears to be critiquing.
Judith Oppenheimer
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
