ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Exclusion by Confusion | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Exclusion by Fiat
    by joannalane on Thursday August 22 2002, @02:51PM (#8659)
    User #2769 Info
    Jon,
    I disagree. As far as I am aware, the ERC asked Esther Dyson (a member the ALOC - At-Large Organizing Committee, and former member of the ALSC - ICANN At-Large Study Committee) and Denise Michel (coordinator of www.at-large.org,
    At-Large Organizing Committee, and former Executive Director of the ALSC) to identify a small group of individuals to provide assistance in defining how an ALAC could be created and what it should do.

    Dyson and Michel asked for volunteers from the ALOC, and the ERC subsequently *appointed* these individuals, in addition to Dyson and Michel, to help craft this report as members of the Assistance Group.

    So given that Bret sits on the ERC, he did, in fact, participate in the selection of those whose task it was to endorse the disenfranchisement of the At Large.

    Regards,
    Joanna
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Exclusion by Fiat by joannalane
    Nonsense!
    by alexander on Friday August 23 2002, @12:42AM (#8667)
    User #22 Info | http://www.icannchannel.de
    Judith and Joanna are spreading FUD. Some people -- and it seems like Judith and Joanna are joining them -- are portraying everyone who not blindly oppose everything coming from ICANN as the Dark Side.

    Judith writes: "Bret didn't have a hand in the report except to help hand-select the people who wrote it." -- nonsense. ERC asked Esther and Denise, Esther and Denise asked on the ALOC list and invited several people.

    Joanna writes: "So given that Bret sits on the ERC (...)" -- nonsense again. Bret is not an ERC member, he is one of eight members of an assistance group writing a report on gTLD policy development. Even if Bret was a member of the ERC, this "participation in the selection" approach is silly -- the ERC did not choose or appoint the ALAC-AG members except for Denise and Esther.

    I hope that both of you apologize.
    / Alexander
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com