| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
gTLD Auctions website established
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 5 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I proposed an unexciting auction scheme for TLDs last year in section 5 of my proposal for reforming the root [proper.com].
Instead of a bidding-up auction, I proposed that everyone offer what they wanted to for any TLD, and the top 25 simply won. This goes along better with the "make the root uninteresting" than schemes that involve high-stakes bidding.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
May I remind everyone of the decision by the IAHC who also wanted to do this, but realized it was a Really Bad Idea. It's one of the few things they got right:
"With regard to the lottery mechanism, Mr Crocker conceded that the selection of registrars, all of whom must first meet an objective set of business and technical criteria, may not be ideal, but said this mechanism was finally favoured by the Committee because it was fair and equitable. An auction giving the right to become a registrar to the highest bidder would unfairly favour wealthy companies, said Mr Crocker, while selection of registrars by the Committee or another body would have been fraught with the possibility of legal complications."
http://www.itu.int/newsarchive/projects/dns-meet/D NS-PressNote.html [itu.int]
eBay is *NOT* an appropriate delegation model/method to replace RFC1591.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
|
From A Five-Step Process for Top Level Domain Additions [syr.edu] Milton L. Mueller & Lee W. McKnight
"A 2-month period in which the winning names would be announced, and possibly, challenged on intellectual property or confusion grounds. We propose ICANN’s uniform dispute resolution procedure be adapted to resolve future TLD disputes."
Milton - you know MUCH better than that. YOU KNOW - everything is confusingly similar. Even the TLD examples you give .mobi, .health and .dns are all confusingly similar to trademarks in the USA - I did not bother to check any other country.
Everybody - have a look yourself at US database TESS [uspto.gov]
Why not first remove the confusion with trademarks?
apple.computer.us.reg - who the heck else could it be?
The authorities (ICANN, US DoC and UN WIPO) aid and abet corporate trademark overreach - violating Competition and Trademark Law.
Trademark Law is UNAMBIGUOUS - a mark is allowed for SPECIFIC goods or service ('classification') in SPECIFIC country.
These corrupt people should all go on trial for perversion of Law.
Garry Anderson - SKILFUL.com [skilful.com]
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
