| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Commerce to Re-Award IANA to ICANN Without Considering Alternatives
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 4 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Dateline: San Francisco
At the IETF meeting here in San Francisco not a soul can be found who believes that ICANN is competent to perform any of the technical functions of IANA.
There is a universal consensus here at the IETF meeting that the IANA functions should be stripped from ICANN as the result of repeatedly demonstrated incompetence.
I wonder what claims of competence were included in ICANN's bid to NTIA, or rather NOAA? Are there any reporters out there willing to pursue a FOIA request to take a look at what ICANN submitted?
And come to think of it - NOAA?!! Pushing the IANA contract through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration does have a strong and foul stench of laundering.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
