| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ELIMINATE all gTLDs (An alternate plan for evolution of the DNS)
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 9 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
In addition, there are entities that are not based in one country or region, such as the UN, Red Cross - a multitude of others. Not all are organizations either. Would you suggest that a multi-national corporation be forced to use a differenct domain for each corporate location?
Sure, why not?
If they are an international entity then registering in 10, 20 or even 100 different .cc's shouldn't be a problem for them.
To turn the question around, do you think it's reasonable to allow a single company to register a single domain name in a single country and there by usurp all other companies and countries that have a stake in the name?
US trademarks don't even prevent the use of the name within the same country, much less globally.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|