| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Gauntlet Thrown Down on ccTLDs?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 4 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
A summary of the papers and of some of the discussion may be found at http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/workshop/cctld/cct ld059.pdf [itu.int]
By-the-way, I notice that my own submission was dismissed by some ICANN folk at the meeting as being nothing more than my personal opinion. One wonders why the ICANN folks were so defensive - I never said that that ICANN's withholding of IANA services to ccTLDs was an official, board-adopted position of ICANN. ICANN's withholding of IANA services is based on a decision made unilaterally by ICANN's "staff", the board was not involved.
I'd like to mention that the submissions of ICANN were never approved by the board and thus, to my mind, are really nothing more than the personal opinions of an ICANN employee.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
