| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
CENTR, ITU, IANA, WS...
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 4 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
There is absolutely no way that IANA's role as the pointer to ccTLDs in the root can be done without politics.
of course; but you're arguing aginst a straw man. CENTR said IANA "must not deal with policy," and i said ICANN "has insistently politicized -- or, more accurately 'policized' -- its conduct of the IANA function." the point isn't some imaginary apolitical realm; rather, it's that the IANA function should be conducted as minimally and neutrally as possible. the fact that that conduct can't be 'pure' in some platonic sense hardly justifies ICANN's abuse of its authority to pursue its parohical agenda.
cheers,
t
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:There will always be politics with IANA's DNS r
by tbyfield
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
