ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Publishes Letter from Gilmore to Cerf | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN Publishes Letter from Gilmore to Cerf
    by hofjes on Friday May 24 2002, @08:29AM (#6504)
    User #60 Info
    ICANN is trying to show bias and influence. Gilmore is largely funding Auerbach's case. Gilmore has an agenda. ICANN would like to the court to believe that by accepting Gilmore's money, Auerbach is obligated to carry out Gilmore's hostile-toward-ICANN agenda. Therefore, ICANN will be detrimentally harmed by allowing Auerbach access to the records, and consequently empowering Auerbach to assist Gilmore.

    The problem with this argument is that Gilmore's message to Cerf articulately sets forth the general problems with ICANN. It does not make threats, even impliedly; nor does it suggest Auerbach would use the documents to hurt ICANN. Rather, Gilmore implies that Auerbach would use the documents to improve ICANN.

    I suppose Gilmore's statements about ICANN going down like Japan might cause a reaction, but the leap to Auerbach's alleged intended improprieties is too large.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Publishes Letter from Gilmore to Cerf
    by tompoe on Friday May 24 2002, @05:01PM (#6511)
    User #3380 Info
    Hi: We have what amounts to a perpetual monopoly being held by NSI?

    We have what amounts to "benefits to certain parties with heavy ties to the U.S. Military"?

    I guess this is worse than I imagined. Who has a pointer to a primer/history of ICANN to recommend? My greatest fear was, that ICANN would turn out to be the "gatekeeper" and no access to the Internet unless they "approved, certified, and registered" my machine, underwear, and socks. Looks like I may have been too naive.
    Thanks, Tom
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Tuesday May 28 2002, @12:17AM (#6526)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    "ICANN does not give a damn about the fundamental rights of citizens or Internet users."

    Correction:

    It DOES, but only to those who belong to large corporations who can afford to register trademarks all over the place.

    Some of the UDRP Panelists are clearly biased and repeatedly make decisions against ICANN's own rules and yet no one kicks them off the panel lists, or challenged them... Why not?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com