| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Publishes Letter from Gilmore to Cerf
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 10 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Hi: We have what amounts to a perpetual monopoly being held by NSI?
We have what amounts to "benefits to certain parties with heavy ties to the U.S. Military"?
I guess this is worse than I imagined. Who has a pointer to a primer/history of ICANN to recommend? My greatest fear was, that ICANN would turn out to be the "gatekeeper" and no access to the Internet unless they "approved, certified, and registered" my machine, underwear, and socks. Looks like I may have been too naive.
Thanks, Tom
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The White Paper contains some history. This has some info regarding US military/intelligence connections. -g
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
