ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ims Would Like to Bid to Run IANA | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    No need to drag the ccTLDs into it
    by phoffman@proper.com on Monday February 10 2003, @10:54AM (#11137)
    User #2063 Info
    IMS made the right decision to argue on the merits of what they can do well, not what ICANN has done wrong (since the DOC obviously thinks they have done fine). Instead of harping on what folks have already heard over and over, IMS points out that the other two parts of IANA also have some room for improvement, and that IMS is in a better place to fix them than ICANN itself.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      Re:No need to drag the ccTLDs into it
      by Anonymous on Monday February 10 2003, @11:56AM (#11138)
      I suspect that the ccTLD folks at .de, .nz, and elsewhere might want to voice their concerns about IANA under ICANN as well - It's only been a couple of months since IANA withheld critical operational updates to ccTLD NS records, thus placing the link between the root and the ccTLD at risk of operational failure. These updates were withheld on specious grounds that have no technical basis and were applied to coerce ccTLDs to sign contracts with ICANN. I wonder what would happen if ICANN-as-IANA tried the same trick with .us?
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      Re:No need to drag the ccTLDs into it
      by dmehus on Monday February 10 2003, @12:20PM (#11139)
      User #3626 Info | http://doug.mehus.info/
      Below is a copy of my letter to the U.S. Department of Commerce [doc.gov], offering support for the IMS' bid to operate the IANA, or, at the very least, have the process be competitively bid.
      Carol Silverman
      Contracting Officer
      U.S. Department of Commerce
      Phone: (301) 258-4505 x226 Fax: (301) 258-4525
      E-mail: csilverman@doc.gov [mailto]
      CC: Karl Auerbach; A. Michael Froomkin; Loren Sunell - Contract Specialist, NOAA
      Dear Ms. Silverman:
      I am writing to you today as a technology-savvy user thoroughly concerned with the continued evolution of the Internet. I am supporting the Internet Multicasting Service, Inc.'s ("IMS") bid to operate the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority ("IANA") and perform the functions therein. IMS is a legitimate 501(c)(3) nonprofit public research corporation. In addition, IMS would ensure the security and stability that the domain name root server system would require.
      The behaviour of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN") over the past four and half years is, at best, poor. It constantly trades favours with big business, allowing domain names to be taken away from legitimate small businesses; its administration of the domain name root server system is severly lacking which resulted in a brute force Denial of Service ("DoS") attack last year that left 7 or 9 of the 13 root servers non-responsive for more than three hours; and it continuely ignores the advice of the Internet community.
      In my opinion, the duties of the IANA and ICANN should be completely separate with the IANA being run, hopefully by IMS, to perform IP address allocation and technical protocol parameter specification and ICANN performing the administration and creation of generic Top-Level Domains ("gTLDs"). I would invite you to contact Karl Auerbach, an elected and current director of ICANN who had to sue ICANN to obtain standard documents that any director of a corporation should have a right to see, at karl@cavebear.com [mailto]. For the purpose of clarity, he won that lawsuit on all counts. I am sure he would not mind filling you in on many of the problems facing ICANN, and why the duties of IANA should be performed by a separate organization. Professor Michael Froomkin would also be a good person to contact at froomkin@law.miami.edu [mailto] for more information. Both of these gentlemen are true professionals in their respective fields and are two of the most highly regarded individuals when it comes to the operation of the Internet. Professor Froomkin also operates ICANNWatch (http://www.icannwatch.org/ [icannwatch.org]), which is a community watchdog group that monitors ICANN's daily activities and reports on them to Internet users around the world.
      Please consider the Internet Multicasting Service, Inc. as the next operator of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, or at the very least, conduct an open and fair bid process.
      Thanks,
      Doug Mehus
      {dmehus}(at}{shaw.ca}
      Enclosures:

      1. Presolicitation Notice (REF#NTIA909-3-0050CH)
      D -- Information technology services, including telecommunications services
      http://www.eps.gov/spg/DOC/NOAA/AGAMD/Reference-Nu mber-NTIA909-3-0050CH/SynopsisP.html

      2. IMS Request that IANA Function be Competitively Bid
      http://not.invisible.net/doc_iana.pdf

      3. Internet Multicasting Service, Inc.
      http://not.invisible.net/Doug Mehus http://doug.mehus.info/ [mehus.info]
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Part of the Vixie Root?
    by isquat on Tuesday February 11 2003, @06:56AM (#11142)
    User #3363 Info | http://i.squ.at/
    Was't IMS partnering with ISC (Vixie) to get .ORG? Is this 'bid' for IANA related to what is happening with f.root, which is cloning itself on a monthly basis? In a year it can be independent.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com