| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Domain Names ARE Protected Speech
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Speech may be anonymous and still protected by the Constitution. The Supreme Court has recognized an anonymity interest in speech, when it has struck down "registration" ordinances for people who distribute handbills, for example.
e.g. WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW
YORK, INC., et al., PETITIONERS v. VILLAGE OF
STRATTON et al.
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1737.ZO .html
First, as our cases involving distribution of unsigned handbills demonstrate,13 there are a significant number of persons who support causes anonymously.14 “The decision to favor anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of one’s privacy as possible.” McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S., at 341—342.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re:Relationship to privacy of whois information
by jberryhill
|
Starting Score: |
3 |
points |
Extra 'Interesting' Modifier |
|
0 |
|
Total Score: |
|
3 |
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|