| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN critics go mainstream
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 3 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
nicely put. however, i'm not so sure that these issues are -- or even should be -- so cut-and-dried. the threshold shouldn't be whether ICANN screws up royally; rather, it should be whether ICANN (a) acts in an equitable and responsible way, and (b) whether ICANN limits itself to its specific function. to date, it's done neither, imo; but nor has it screwed up royally. instead, it has sought to use its monopoly over a few linchpin issues to expand its mandate by creating alliances and patronage networks at the expense of a more equitable treatment of its diverse constituencies.
cheers,
t
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:They don't run it
by tbyfield
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
