| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Senator Burns Takes Aim at ICANN (Again)
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 5 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I don't see how if ICANN fails in its mission then DoC and Congress are to blame but if Congress looks to become more active in oversight than ICANN will fail in its mission.
To just give up control of certain key aspects to appease parties outside of national jurisdiction in the "hope" that some new reform of a quasi-governmental entity will succeed seems pretty reckless to me.
I, for one, am tired of appeasement and would much rather see the pendulum swing towards accountability and not "hope". Then go from there. With this said, I agree that Burns is just blowing smoke...just going through the motions.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
