| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
.af Redelegation: Another Government-Initiated Redelegation
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 10 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
All we see is the letter from the purported administrative contact - a letter that contained no return address or other way to begin to evaluate its authenticity.
How did that letter arrive? Did it arrive by postal mail - in which case it presumably was in an envelope with a postmark. Or did a duck waddle out of the remaining marshlands of Marina del Rey and drop the letter in Louis Touton's car? Isn't it odd that someone who purports to be an administrative contact doesn't disclose his e-mail address.
If in the sex.com case it is found that Verisign was negligent in its handling of the fraudulant transfer request, then what can we say about the degree of care that was exercised by ICANN as IANA when the subject matter is not a simple domain in .com but instead something much more significant, a ccTLD, the name of a nation on the Internet?
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|