| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Sensible (and Tactical) Thoughts on New TLDs from the Business Constituency
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 16 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
well, I am not looking to promote or bash new.net and you seem to understand their operations better than I. I am only pointing to a registry operation that operates in what is considered an alt root and has a certain base of registrations outside of the A-root with a certain amount of operational history now to evaluate whether it is technically sound consistent with the document released by ICANN's business constituency. But, I am also suggesting that due to ICANN's ICP-3, I do not see how an alt root registry - even if scaled and qualified to the highest technical degree - can meet stability criteria and if it is deemed that this is possible may then influence the propogation of TLD registries in alt roots, thus inconsistent with ICANN's rather vague definition of technical stability. Perhaps the business constituency should address this?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
