| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ICANN to Give .org to ISOC: Insiders Win Again?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 32 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Sotiris Sotiropoulos raises an interesting point on the GA list. How can ISOC be a registry and also be heavily involved with the At Large (at least ICANN's version of it)? And why does the report give an email address for comments, and not ICANN's own forum? So that the comments aren't open and transparent to all? Thomas Roessler's blog, link to the left on this page, points to additional press coverage. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
 |
And Thomas Roessler now points to ICANN's new version of its open forum, previously used for ICANN's Evolution and Reform. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|