| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN to Give .org to ISOC: Insiders Win Again?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 32 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Did every applicant for .org have an inside representative on the ICANN BoD? It's beginning to appear that way.
I mean, doesn't DoC consider this shifty, sleazy, and unethical?
Guess not.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did every applicant for .org have an inside representative on the ICANN BoD? It's beginning to appear that way.
I'm pretty sure that UnityRegistry didn't.
And, logically, if every applicant had an inside rep then there's ten ineffective insiders and one effective one :-)
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
