ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Where Are the Lynn Plan's Defenders? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 6 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    A few more articles
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Monday February 25 2002, @12:35PM (#5071)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    siliconvalley.com, ICANN to change name to UCANT
    Reuters, ICANN chief proposes new standards (via Zdnet)
    David McGuire, Newsbytes.com,
    ICANN President Defends Proposed Reforms
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Where Are the Lynn Plan's Defenders?
    by Mpawlo on Tuesday February 26 2002, @01:06AM (#5075)
    User #2936 Info | http://www.pawlo.com/
    Well, if ICANN is supposed to have a broader scope of business I think it is approriate to involve the users more. While the ICANN elections are a true joke (just look at the results in Africa) a representation of users and non-users through theirs governments respectively is a good idea in my opinion.

    From a democratic point of view, this is a much better proposal than the one suggested by the At Large Study Committee where domain name holders should be the ones electing ICANN board members.

    If ICANN is not supposed to broaden its scope of action, the proposal might be a view of slightly overdoing the administration of new top level domain names.

    Just my EURO 0,02.

    Mikael Pawlo

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Where Are the Lynn Plan's Defenders?
    by polk on Tuesday February 26 2002, @05:29AM (#5078)
    User #30 Info
    I'm not sure I'd classify myself as a defender, but . . .

    I can't see the theoretical objection to trying to get governments involved in the process. If the last few years of ICANN has taught us anything, it's that a so-called "private" governance structure will have many of the same challenges with accountability and transparency as traditional goverments do. And at least we've got things in place to try to address these issues in the real government context. (Frankly, I would not feel any worse about the DNS if it was being run by the Department of Commerce.)

    Second, I would imagine that as governments get involved, even _less_ actual policymaking, etc. will get done. If we think the present ICANN processes are slow and inefficient -- try mixing in several government bodies! As one who views the ICANN role as -- shall we say -- more limited than what the current ICANN-ers seem to believe, this strikes me as another positive for the Lynn plan, though perhaps not one Lynn would suggest.

    Third, if there is a long-term danger to the DNS system, it is (in my view) the governmentally-decreed segmentation of the system. This can (and I expect will) happen as various governments start to pay more attention to ICANN and its problems -- and literally "take their networks and go home". Perhaps this danger can be limited by getting governments involved and buying-in to ICANN.

    I do agree with many of the objections to the plan. I cannot imagine how ICANN can spend so much money. I seriously doubt that the Bush Department of Commerce wants to wade back into this morass (absent some serious technical crisis).

    Again, not really a defense, just some observations . . .
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com