| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
IETF Chair Calls for ICANN to Relinquish IANA to IETF
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 2 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Interesting. I agree with the diagnosis.
But how did ICANN get control of IANA? It seems to me that it did so with the active participation and approval of the IAB. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Milton Mueller
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
the article can unfortunately be read in a couple of ways.
I don't think that the IANA function that ICANN runs for the IETF needs to be moved at the moment. (This function does NOT include addresses and TLDs).
But there have been cases where people have accused ICANN of interfering with the IETF IANA function, or the DoC of having "supreme control" of the IETF IANA function. These cases irritate me.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
