ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    US Govt. Agency Says .us Procurement (Partly) Unlawful | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 59 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Please stop diverting attention
    by WIPOorgUK on Monday February 18 2002, @12:10PM (#4951)
    User #3146 Info | http://wipo.org.uk/
    > Please call someone at NeuStar and ask them if first names ... What free speech use does someone have to register microsoft.us ...

    Using microsoft as example, you are deliberately diverting attention away from the fact that in Sunrise, DICTIONARY words will be given to trademarks - in actual effect, they will remove them from public use.

    So - please answer a simple YES or NO - do they abridge US citizen rights to use these words?

    Give it a go without spin - YES or NO?

    > Sunrise, if done properly can work. Watch and see.

    1) Does Sunrise solve any problems at all e.g. 'consumer confusion' or 'trademark conflict'?

    2) If 1000 Sunrises in new gTLD, will all trademarks be guaranteed to be get their mark?

    3) If 1000 Sunrises in new gTLD, will all trademarks be able to use their mark anyhow, without 'consumer confusion' or 'trademark conflict' etc.?

    The answer to those three questions is NO.

    Sunrise will make things a lot worse.

    Primarily, Sunrise abridges what words people like yourself can use - violating the First Amendment.

    You just give control of all words to trademark holders.

    Fact: domain names were not designed to be trademarks - ask Paul Mockapetris, creator of Domain Name System. He was asked, what do you wish you had invented? His reply, "A directory system for the Internet that wouldn’t be controlled by the politicians, lawyers and bureaucrats."

    Fact: Trademarks 'raison d'être' is to identify source of goods or services - not claim world rights to a word.

    A lawyer said this to me - perhaps you may agree:

    Yes, Sunrise was Bull* propoganda. Nevertheless, I'm giving you my professional legal opinion when I say "tough luck".

    As he admitted: "Incidentally, you'd probably 'freak' if you found out how much my firm charges me out for."

    - he would say "tough luck", wouldn't he.

    Unless you can give me a better answer than "tough luck", to those two charges (that they could use in a court of Law) - then they are corrupt.

    I bet you cannot.

    Incidentally, believe you could be wrong about first names - they may allow them e.g. Johns.us (74487394) to sell wine or (72217928) to sell pizza.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com